As I said last year, I hate to compare things I love. But for the sake of a more interesting blog post, I’m going to anyway. In real life, I don’t really like playing favorites, because different books and movies and stuff all have their own spirit, and are ultimately incomparable. But let’s disregard that for a few moments.
For books, the nominees are books I finished reading for the first time this year, regardless of their release date. Movies, TV shows, and film scores must be from 2011. (Books I only read a few chapters from are not qualified. Also, I actually only finished reading five books this year, and only one was fiction.)
Here we go… and Happy New Year!
Year’s best live-action film:
Year’s best animated film:
Year’s best TV show:
Year’s best film score:
Year’s best non-fiction book:
Year’s best fiction book:
Best whatever else:
Best game soundtrack:
After years, nay, decades of being stuck in development
hell heck, it seems a film version of one of my favorite books of all time, Ender’s Game, is finally getting the big screen treatment. According to this article:
Summit Entertainment, the production company behind "The Twilight Saga" films, has acquired the rights to the youth-oriented "Ender’s Game" franchise. … The shoot is scheduled to run from February 24, 2012 through June 8, 2012.
To be honest, I’m not holding my breath for the film to be amazing. It certainly has potential, but I think it will be a very tough adaptation. Although it’s sci-fi, and there’s certainly some sci-fi battle action involved, it is not an action adventure story. It is, I think, a drama more than anything else. And if they overdo the action and underplay the social issues, I don’t think it’ll work story-wise. But if they overdo the social issues and underplay the action, it will be a marketing nightmare. The story deals with a "battle school" filled with children, yet it is certainly not a happy Disney-ish or Nickelodeon-ish kids’ adventure, and I hope they don’t try turning it into one, even though that would make it much more marketable.
All that said, I’m excited that it’s finally gotten to this point of development, and I look forward to watching what happens.
Finally finished reading a book, woohoo! It was on hold at the library, so I had to hurry up. ‘Twas The Lost Gate by Orson Scott Card, one of my favourite writers. ‘Twas a fun read. Not quite Ender’s Game, but hard to put down nonetheless. Makes you want to be a gatemage. Makes you look forward to Portal 2, coming out soon! Now I look forward to the sequels, for this seems to be the first book of a trilogy or something.
There are two quotes I liked. First, from page 106:
Besides, it just felt . . . wrong. Inelegant, perhaps, as Auntie Tweng used to say of kludgy solutions to math or programming problems. “Yes, it works,” she would say, “but it’s not elegant. Truth is simple and elegant. That’s how you know it when you see it.”
Those last two sentences. “Truth is simple and elegant. That’s how you know it when you see it.” Almost Occam’s razor-ish. I’m not sure if it’s true (for it can’t explain the truth of itself), but I like the idea.
Also, in the afterword, on page 382:
I tell my students in my writing classes that suspense comes, not from knowing almost nothing, but from knowing almost everything and caring very much about the small part still unknown.
Great little writing tidbit. Mystery can still come from not knowing much, but it’s not suspenseful (or nearly as interesting) until the focus is on that one last answer, that one final piece to the puzzle. Search your feelings, you know it to be true. (Plus, it’s simple and elegant.)
Oh, it’s also a fun book if you know your mythology. Which I don’t, but I’m just assuming.
You might be wondering: “gee whiz, I wonder what exactly Sean is up to these days?” If so, I will tell you in this post that I am writing right now.
I’m in week 10 of class 3 of Animation Mentor. It continues to go very well; I’ve learned a ton of stuff this semester. I’ve gotten better at managing my time, but I still find myself pulling very late-nighters or all-nighters the night before assignments are due. But at least I’m not feeling the pressure like I was during the previous classes. I still wish my (almost full-time) part-time job didn’t take up so much time, but I need the $$$ for Animation Mentor tuition (and paying off college loans).
I requested a Leave of Absence for the Animation Mentor Spring 2011 term because I want to watch the trees blossom. But mostly because I want to dedicate as much time as I can to researching and developing my melody generator. My main goal would be to be create and sell an Android app; that has the potential to make some $$$, and Android is Java-based and I’m developing my algorithms in Java anyway, so it would be mostly a matter of getting an Android GUI to work, and figuring out how Android can handle MIDI files (I know it can play them, but can it create them?). I’m not sure if this is something I could accomplish in just 12 weeks, but it’s worth a shot.
Other than that, I’m reading The Lost Gate by Orson Scott Card (the first non-Ender novel from him I’ve read), which is quite fun, along with a number of non-fiction books (I tend to just read whatever chapters interest me, because of my limited time).
I’m also continuing to plan out my fantasy novel and working on a couple of new short stories, one likely to be titled The Boy in the Sword (which I’m almost done writing) and the other currently untitled.
Oh, and I rarely preorder stuff on Amazon, but I had to preorder this: The Lord of the Rings: The Motion Picture Trilogy (Extended Edition) [Blu-ray]. Really looking forward to it.
I recently finished a novelette of around 11,400 words. (I’m using the SFWA‘s definition of a novelette: a story between 7,500 and 17,500 words.) I think that’s the longest work I’ve ever written and actually finished. The story is called Dreamgiver, and you might be able to guess what it’s about: a man has the power to give people dreams. I’m sure it’s been done in fiction somewhere before, but hopefully my story still has some newnesss to it. I could probably write many more stories from that same idea; I think it leads to a lot of possibilities. I could probably write a series of novels based on that premise, if I could actually finish writing novels. I’m not sure the name Dreamgiver is the best, but it’s straight-forward and to-the-point. It sort of instantly tells you what the story is about. That said, it does seem just a wee bit cheesy to me. But then, my writing probably seems cheesy to some people, so I guess it will match.
Anyway, I’m going to send this story through Critters some time to get it critiqued, though I realize I won’t get many (if any) because of it’s length. Right now my previous short story, No One Was Abendsen, is in line waiting to get critiqued. I’ll be very interested to see how people react to that story as it was somewhat experimental for me.
I’ve got some other ideas for short stories floating around in my mind, so I’ll probably try my hand at another one before I get back to composing music.
Favorite books on writing
First, I’ll just tell you what the books are:
And now I’ll blather about my reasoning:
I think reading books on writing is much easier than actually writing, so I think it can be dangerous for wannabe writers to constantly seek out books on the subject. They can only be helpful if you actually spend some time writing. No amount of reading can replace that. That goes for the other arts as well. You can’t learn how to compose music by reading music theory books. You just have to do it. I think sometimes there’s a fear of failing, so the wannabe artist spends more time reading about the subject than actually practicing it.
Similarly, beware of writing about writing. I think writing about writing is also easier than actually writing. There seem to be a lot more people wanting to talk about writing tips and hints and how-to’s and strategies than there are successful authors. I don’t think that’s necessarily bad in and of itself, people can talk about whatever they want, and even unsuccessful authors can have some very helpful tips. Just make sure you don’t forget what it’s all for: actually writing. (On a side note, sometimes it seems like some writers who write about writing just sort of regurgitate advice they’ve heard before and don’t really understand why it exists. For instance: “show, don’t tell!” Make sure you filter any writing advice you hear through your own opinionated mind; you are allowed to disagree. Never blindly follow advice, otherwise you can’t really follow it.)
That said, there are very few books on writing I’ve read all the way through. Usually I find books on writing to be empty or boring or pointless or simply a collection of regurgitated advice. I find advice like “make your main character interesting!” completely unhelpful. Duh, I wanna make my character interesting. If a writer doesn’t know that intuitively, full time consideration of another endeavor might be in order. (On a boring a tangent, I hate when people suggest you need to know every tiny little thing about your character, like their eye color and height and shoe size and favorite ice-cream, as if you’re playing The Sims. That’s great if it helps you, but to me it’s a complete waste of time.)
In my opinion, the best writing books are not actually books on “How To Write”, they are books on “What This Author Thinks About Writing”, and I think that’s the way it should be. Writing is an art, not physics. It is guided by people’s tastes and opinions, though some academic writing books might want you to believe otherwise. Therefore, I think the best writing books for you are the ones written by the authors you already know you enjoy. For some reason, I think that kind of helps you know where they’re coming from. Because you already like their fiction, you’ll probably agree with most of the advice the writer gives and the opinions he or she has.
If the only writers you like are ones that have nothing to say about the process of writing, then you’re out of luck. Too bad; I guess you can never be a writer.
Fortunately for me, that’s not the case. Two of my favorite authors are Ayn Rand and Orson Scott Card, and they both have books on writing, so those are pretty much my favorite books on writing.
Ayn Rand’s Books on Writing
I can’t say I agree with all of Ayn Rand’s philosophies, but I’ve found her writing to be quite immersive. In my opinion, she’s fantastic at describing characters’ motivations and attitudes. Her stories also have very strong themes, which I think is lacking in some of the fiction I read. So much fiction these days is purely about the action and has nothing to say beyond that. It’s like the author saw an action movie and just wanted to regurgitate it with different characters. Anyway, Ayn Rand talks all about themes and how they relate to plotting.
Rand also talks about creating believable characters and dialogue. Usually I think some beginning writers (I’m obviously a beginning writer too) think those are the easiest things: creating believable characters and dialogue. Personally I’ve found it difficult. When you have two characters who have completely different world-views, you really have to get inside their heads for each line of dialogue. Back and forth and back and forth you have to go between trying to trick yourself into believing things you don’t. Tricky, in my opinion. Well, some scenes aren’t, some scenes are pretty fun, especially if you’re writing humor. Other times, it’s just plain hard.
Finally, Rand talks about style and writing descriptions. If you’ve read her fiction, you might know she can be very verbose in her descriptions, and in my opinion, it works. For her. I think if you try to mimic her, you’ll just come off as being far too wordy. So, in my opinion, what she has to say about style is very helpful.
Although The Art of Nonfiction is about writing nonfiction, I think a lot she says in that book still applies to writing fiction, so it’s a great companion to the other one. I won’t blather much about this book, though, because I have a headache. If you like The Art of Fiction, then The Art of Nonfiction is also worth a read.
Orson Scott Card’s Books on Writing
As I stated above, I find that characters can be quite tricky. Fortunately, Orson Scott Card wrote an entire book on the subject: Characters and Viewpoint. However, don’t let the title trick you into thinking this book is about a small subject in fiction. Characters without stories and stories without characters are extremely hard to find; they’re very strongly linked. Thus, in my opinion, learning about creating characters is learning how to create a compelling story. So it’s not like you’d get this book and then say “Oh, now I need a book on plot!” . . . though Card doesn’t talk about it by itself, you’ll still find that it relates strongly to characters (character development, duh!). That said, this book is part of a series called Elements of Fiction Writing, the other books by other authors. I found this addition to the series to be the only one worth buying.
Card’s How to Write Science Fiction and Fantasy lets him deal with the entire subject. There is just a wee bit of overlap, and Characters and Viewpoint I thought was overall more helpful (for me), but this is still a very worthy mention.
These books aren’t long; they’re all under 200 pages. I’ve found them so useful that they are among some of the only books I reread every now and then. They’re the most worth buying, in my opinion, or at least checking out from a library.
To restate what I said above, I think the best books on writing for you will be the ones by writers you enjoy. I’ve taken a look at many books on writing, and they can certainly get empty and useless. Above all, don’t blindly agree with what you read in books on writing. Just because it’s published doesn’t mean you have to like it; you’re allowed to disagree. There are no “rules” in art, only observations and opinions. Think for yourself. Then when you come across a book on writing you do agree with, it will be far more helpful. Ayn Rand and Orson Scott Card do not agree on all subjects when it comes to writing, as is evident by these books. So I get to determine who’s right and who’s wrong. Neener neener.
So write! Now!