A tragically short glimpse at Pixar’s next short, to precede Monsters University. It’s awesome how much expression they can get with just eyes, eyebrows, mouths, and head movement. Something to study.
Movies
The Cabin in the Woods ending made no sense
Since I talk about the ending of the film here, this post contains SPOILERS. It probably won’t make any sense to someone who hasn’t seen the movie anyway.
The Cabin in the Woods was funny, clever, and quite innovative. But, overall, it did not hold up for me because I didn’t understand the ending. As the end approached, it seemed as if the main characters were getting deeper into the heart of horror stories, even if metaphorically. They were discovering why horror stories were told, why the tropes were upheld. I thought the film was going to give us some sort of interesting insight. But I think the writers got it wrong. They either ignore the themes of horror stories, or simply refuse to accept them.
“They didn’t just want us to die,” a character says near the film’s end, as they discover their horror story experience was all part of some elaborate scheme much bigger and more important than themselves. “They wanted us to be punished.”
“Punish us for what?”
“For being young,” another character says.
So, we want young people to be punished in horror stories because of their youth?
Not in the real world. Youth has nothing to do with it; horror stories work with characters of any age. Youth just makes it easier for a character to be believably immature.
The horrible punishments horror story victims receive is actually for being hedonists. For being somehow morally flawed. Just like the Willy Wonka victims. It’s for believing in and pursuing empty pleasures. Horror story monsters are the embodiment of the spiritual emptiness of the characters’ pursuits or world views, whether it be lust, anger, pride, etc., or something more subtle.
In the film, these youthful deaths are rituals made to placate mysterious ancient gods in the underworld.
In reality, the rituals (in other words: horror stories) are for us humans, to serve to remind us of these lessons, of what is morally right and wrong. Casting our consciences into a pit of giant ancient evil gods makes very little sense. (Unless you are a moral relativist, I guess?)
The tropes of horror films become “tropes” not because they are actually devoid of merit or spiritual meaning, but because they become so recognizable and guessable that, together, they lose their ability to remind us of their meaning. This doesn’t mean the tropes were always actually empty silly nonsense, or that we should discard them.
Movies
Movies watched in October 2012
I’m three months behind on this, so I’ll split it up into three posts. So here are the movies I watched for the first time in October 2012:
Antitrust
This 2001 corporate thriller stars Ryan Phillippe (remember when he used to be in movies?) as a young way-to-cool-to-be-an-actual-nerd genius programmer and Tim Robbins as an evil Bill Gates-type of boss. Ryan is hired by Tim to work on a secret project, but it becomes clear that Tim and his secret thugs are stealing code! Some very clear anti-Microsoft sentiments here. But all the action comes off as unbelievable and laughable. The film features characters briefly looking over a screen’s worth of code and saying “Wow, this is really incredible!” Those must be some mighty fine algorithms! I suppose the filmmakers were depending on viewer ignorance, because I can’t imagine any real coder being impressed with someone else’s work after studying only one little chunk of it, especially without even knowing what the whole program does. Anyway, Ryan must figure out how to stop his boss from using the secret project to take over the world or something similarly sinister. Overall, the film is just too ridiculous. Maybe one of those movies to have on in the background while you eat a midnight snack.
The Sword of Doom
This 1966 Japanese film directed by Kihachi Okamoto and starring good old Tatsuya Nakadai tells the story of an apparently amoral samurai who . . . does a bunch of things. It’s rather all over the place. He kills people, joins some kind of justice group, kills more people. It all seemed a bit too random for me to follow very closely. It seems they were hoping to make sequels, which they never did. The film ends with a sort of cliffhanger, leaving storylines unresolved. How annoying.
E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial
This classic Steven Spielberg film from 1982 tells the story of young Elliott who, while trying to cope with his parents’ recent divorce, befriends a little ugly lost alien. My siblings and I used to watch this film back in the early 90’s on VHS (the tape with the green top!), but I had forgotten much of it, including what exactly the overall story was about. The film played at the local theater for one night (through “Fathom Events”), so I went to see it. Unfortunately it looked like they were projecting it with a DVD’s resolution; for some reason the image looked terrible. However, the movie was great, and I was finally able to piece together the story that I didn’t quite understand when I was seven or whatever. Great film.
The Searchers
This 1956 Western directed by John Ford and starring John Wayne tells the story of a man who goes searching for his niece, who was kidnapped by Indians. It’s considered a classic and was supposedly quite influential for a lot of filmmakers. It left me rather unimpressed, dare I say, after having been spoiled with the fast-paced action film’s of today.
The Avengers
This 2012 action film directed by Joss Whedon tells the story of all the Marvel comic books superheroes (Iron Man, Hulk, Guy With Crossbow, etc.) getting together to defeat the villain Loki. While the writing was refreshing for a superhero movie (though Nolan’s Batman films still stand supreme), the overall story seemed a bit ridiculous to me. The overall tone seemed a bit muddled among the wide variety of characters; there was something imbalanced about the character dynamics. Maybe I just don’t like Iron Man’s character enough; it’s like he tries too hard to be hip and cool and rogue-ish, and it doesn’t seem genuine. Fun movie, but when it comes to superhero movies, I prefer Nolan’s Batman, and when it comes to Whedon’s work, I prefer Firefly.
21 Jump Street
This 2012 film stars Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum. Its based on the TV show of the same name from the 1980’s and tells the story of two bumbling police officers who, because they are just so incapable, are put undercover as high school students to investigate a dangerous drug ring. Whoever in my family rented this probably didn’t realize how raunchy it was. Funny film, but really stupid.
J. Edgar
This 2011 film from director Clint Eastwood stars Leo DiCaprio as J. Edgar Hoover and tells the story of Mr. Hoover forming the FBI. I don’t know much about the real Hoover, but the film turns him into a somewhat paranoid power-hungry control-freak who can’t figure out his love life. The problem with most biographical films is that turning someone’s entire life into a story always has to grossly oversimplify a person’s personality and life events, and make guesses at his motivations, desires, and insecurities. Sometimes they can pull it off with elegance, as in Gandhi. Sometimes it seems like a hodge-podge with little actual story, as with this film.
Kes
This 1969 British film from director Ken Loach is based on the British novel A Kestrel for a Knave. It tells the story of a young man who just don’t get no respect at home or at school. He copes with the loneliness by adopting a kestrel and learning how to train it. The film is very observational, with the filmmaker not trying to dictate your emotions as much as in modern Hollywood’s films. This does risk alienating some audiences, as do the characters’ accents. They speak English, but with such thick accents and some weird slang that I had to turn captions on to understand them. Any of the film’s political messages are lost on me, but, perhaps because the the filmmaker’s more observational approach to the filming, the actors and conversations did seem much more realistic, and when that happens you may find yourself more emotionally involved than when you’re subconsciously always viewing everything as part of a movie. For example, if you ever watch the news and see violence caught on a surveillance camera, you may notice that you have a much more visceral response to the images because you know that they’re real. Movies like this (which are usually foreign) can have the same effect, but the trade-off is that you cannot put yourself in the characters’ shoes as comfortably. I don’t know; it’s something I’ll have to think about. Anyway, good film, even though any of its “cultural significance” is lost on me.
Hotel Transylvania
This 2012 computer animated feature from Sony Pictures Animation was directed by Genndy Tartakovsky, known for his cartoon Dexter’s Laboratory (of which the second season still isn’t out on DVD – come on, Cartoon Network). The film tells the story of Dracula, who runs a hotel for monsters, and his relationship with his daughter, who is eager to explore the world beyond the hotel. But Dracula is a humanist (if putting “ist” on the end of something implies prejudice against it). He blames humans for the death of his wife, and therefore wants his daughter to have nothing to do with them. To complicate matters, a human stumbles into the hotel and Dracula’s daughter falls in love with him. I thought the film was surprisingly charming, summoning the good old feelings of watching Saturday morning cartoons without trying to be all trendy and sophisticated. Of the three Halloween-themed animated features this year (the other two being ParaNorman and Frankenweenie), this one was my favorite. Fun movie. I’d love to see Genndy direct more animated features if he gets the chance, especially this sort of cartoony stuff.
The Road
This 2009 film, based on the book of the same name by Cormac McCarthy, tells the story of a father and son trying to survive in a post-apocalyptic world. There wasn’t much in the way of story. It was just a bunch of random incidents exploring what issues people might deal with when society crumbled. Rather boring.
Infernal Affairs
This crime thriller from 2002 from Hong Kong was remade in the USA as the Oscar-winning The Departed. The story tells of a cop who goes undercover to work for a crime boss in an effort to take him down. But his progress is complicated by an undercover criminal who is working for the police. So begins the two-way cat-and-mouse game. This original version does less character development, so the ending is, in my opinion, a bit weaker than the American version, but it makes up for it in just about every other way, from the cinematography to the music to the writing. Even though I could guess what would happen after seeing The Departed, the film had me on the edge of my seat. Overall, I thought it was better than its remake. Great film.
Mimic
In my effort to watch all Guillermo del Toro’s films, I watched this 1997 horror film directed by him. It tells the story of scientists fighting against giant human-eating cockroaches who have mutated some weird anatomy that allows them to mimic the human form, thus making it easier for them to catch their human prey. Overall, quite ridiculous.
Reservoir Dogs
This 1992 bloody crime thriller from Quentin Tarantino tells the story of a diverse set of criminals trying to figure out how their diamond heist somehow went wrong. It features Tarantino’s usual flare for mesmerizing dialogue, some great acting, and great twists and turns throughout, despite its vulgar language and violence. Great film.
Grave of the Fireflies
This 1988 animated film from Japan, written and directed by Isao Takahata, tells the story of how two children, a young man and his little sister, die of malnutrition during the firebombing of Japan during World War II. This is perhaps the most tragic film I’ve ever seen. Very powerful. It doesn’t try to manipulate you into empathizing with the characters. If anything, it makes it very clear that the main character is making bad choices that you know will result in starvation. And it doesn’t try to portray the little sister as all innocent and cutesy, as filmmakers often try to do. Still, you can feel the love and trust between the siblings, which makes the descent into tragedy just devastating to watch. Great film. Not great in the sense that you walk away feeling very good, but in that it’s quite a powerful film.
Frankenweenie
Based on his original 1984 short film, this stop-motion animated feature from 2012 from director Tim Burton tells the story young Victor Frankenstein who brings his dead dog back to life with the use of lightning. (I haven’t seen the original short, but I’d love to get my hands on it sometime.) While the film started out funny and interesting, it seemed like about halfway through they ran out of material. The second act was a chaotic uninspired nonsensical mess.
The Next Three Days
This 2010 thriller from director Paul Haggis and starring Russell Crowe tells the story of a man who firmly believes his wife, convicted of murder, has been wrongly imprisoned. When he can’t solve the problem in courts, he sets out to free his wife from prison with a prison break and a dash out of the country. Fun movie.
Year's best
My 2012 favorites
A bit late posting this, but I was too busy celebrating and spreading Christmas cheer earlier. As I say each year: I hate to compare things I love. But for the sake of a more interesting blog post, I’m going to anyway. In real life, I don’t really like playing favorites, because different books and movies and stuff all have their own spirit, and are ultimately incomparable. But let’s disregard that for a few moments.
For books, the nominees are books I finished reading for the first time this year, regardless of their release date. Movies, TV shows, and film scores must have been first released in the USA in 2012.
Year’s best live action film:
Year’s best animated film:
Year’s best TV show:
Year’s best film score:
Year’s best nonfiction book:
Year’s best fiction book:
Best whatever else:
Year’s best book on writing:

Movies
Interesting movies for 2013
Here are the movies I’ll be interested in checking out in the upcoming year:

Oz: The Great and Powerful
March 8, 2013. Mixed feelings about this. While I think the overall idea could be a ton of fun, I’m worried it will turn out generic and uninspired. But I’ll give it a chance.

The Croods
March 22, 2013. This is the film one of my animation mentors from DreamWorks was working on while I studied animation. The trailers were funny, but I still don’t know what the overall story is about.

The Host
March 29, 2013. Yes, it’s based on a book by the author of the Twilight, but this one doesn’t look like romance, so hopefully I’ll be safe from such girlish daydreams. The main reason I’m interested in this film is director Andrew Niccol, in whose work I have yet to be disappointed.

Jurassic Park 3D
April 5, 2013. This is one of my favorite films of all time. I can’t wait to see it in 3D. Roar.
Man of Steel
June 14, 2013. I normally have no interest in Superman, and have yet to see any film or TV show featuring this silly flying alien man in tights. However, the trailers were intriguing, and with a screen story by Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer, a screenplay by David S. Goyer, and the awesome eye for fantastic visuals of director Zack Snyder, I’ll check it out.

Monsters University
June 21, 2013. While Pixar slips away from the glory it once was, and continues to descend into the depths of series-dom, we are given a prequel to Monsters, Inc. Honestly, this looks rather uninspired, but I’ll give it a chance just because they are Pixar.

Despicable Me 2
July 5, 2013. OK, even though I just said that series-dom was a depth to be descended to, some films have obvious sequel potential. I still have no idea what this sequel will be about, but the first one was funny enough that I think I will enjoy seeing these characters return.

Pacific Rim
July 12, 2013. From director Guillermo del Toro. I guess it’s about giant robots fighting mystical monsters near the coast of the Pacific. The trailer looked awesome; definitely a huge special effects film.

Turbo
July 16, 2013. This animated feature from DreamWorks has something to do with a snail who dreams of being a racer. But, wait. Snails are slow! Whatever will happen? Don’t know much about this film yet, but I’ll keep an eye on it.
The Seventh Son
October 18, 2013. I know nothing about this, but I like the look and feel of the production photographs that have been released, and the storyline from IMDb sounds interesting enough for me: “John Gregory, a seventh son of a seventh son and the local Spook, has protected the country from witches, boggarts, ghouls, and all manner of things that go bump in the night. However, John is not young anymore and has been seeking out an apprentice to carry on his trade. Most have failed to survive. The last hope to the county a young farmer’s son named Thomas Ward…” OK, let’s go.
Ender’s Game
November 1, 2013. My favorite sci-fi novel turned into a movie? Impossible. While it’s based on the book, the spirit of the book is very internal, very thought-driven, making it un-filmable. So the success of this film will depend on director Gavin Hood’s interpretation; what he adds to it as much as what he’s forced to take out. I look forward to watching it, but I can’t imagine it living up to the book. But if it helps steer some audiences towards the book, that’s not a bad thing. And it’s got Harrison Ford, who is perfect for his role.

Frozen
November 29, 2013. From Disney Animation comes an animated interpretation of my favorite Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale: The Snow Queen. It looks like they’re changing around a lot of the story, though, as Disney tends to do. We’ll see.
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
December 13, 2013. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was fantastic. So of course I’m looking forward to the second chapter.
Saving Mr. Banks
December 20, 2013. This Disney live-action drama, starring Tom Hanks as Walt Disney and Emma Thompson as P. L. Travers, author of the Mary Poppins books, tells the behind-the-scenes (but surely embellished, because Uncle Walt never did evil) story of creating Disney’s classic film, Mary Poppins.
And that’s it for now. Lots to look forward to.
Philosophy
Trust
I think there’s a lot of stress and fear out there. The basic fears: Will I find a job? Will I have enough money? Enough food? Shelter? And then there are deeper fears that claw at one’s heart, even if people are too afraid to challenge them face to face: Am I good-looking? Am I loved? Am I worthy of love? Am I worth anything? Am I a good person? Do I belong here?
What saddens me just as much as the recent shooting is the number of people encouraging others to be enraged by it, to fuel themselves with the spirit of anger. The idea that anger and rage will somehow bring about justice is a terrible folly; these emotions only make truth harder to see. The world is ruled more by the spirit of our hearts than the coverage of our laws. We should be working for heart change more than law change. Otherwise, even with stricter laws, things are going to get much worse.
If you want to make a huge difference, think of the person or types of people you hate the most, and abandon that hate, give it up. And when someone or something makes you feel hurt and hated and fills you with that rage again, give it up again. You may not see the ripple effect this will produce; this world is too complex for our tiny minds. But all humans are connected and it will ripple. We may still disagree on things, but then our discussions will be fueled by love of truth, not contempt for rivalry.
And give up your fears. It’s a supreme, almost unnatural act of trust, but there is no real wisdom in suffering yourself with them.
Somebody else already taught these things a couple thousand years ago, but His message is doubted or ignored, perhaps because it sounds too good to be true, or perhaps because we think we’re too modern and smart for it nowadays. We’ll be celebrating His birth soon, a good time to remember that it’s all true. And this physical life is just the beginning.
God bless.
Movies
Lord of the Rings marathon was great!
Today (or yesterday, I suppose, since it’s 2 AM) I spent about thirteen hours in the movie theater watching a Lord of the Rings Extended Editions trilogy marathon. About twenty to thirty people showed up; I thought it would be more popular, but I guess thirteen hours is a rather long time. I thought it might test my stamina, but I was able to watch attentively without getting tired or getting a sore back (they had good comfy seats, good for tall people), or having to go to the bathroom halfway through a film, though I’m sure sitting for thirteen hours wasn’t very healthy at all. Watching in a theater also offered less distractions, whereas if I did a marathon at home, I’d probably be pausing the film all the time. Although we didn’t have the biggest screen of the theater, it was still much more glorious to see and hear these epic films on such a big screen than on a home TV. It’s just awesome when movies like these take up more of your visual field, and the theater’s 4K projectors are wonderful. (I’d love to get one for my home, they’re only $25K…)
Finally, even though I’ve seen the films plenty of times, they continue to inspire and excite me. I got some good energy to finish my novel-in-progress, and continued to get new story ideas from the trilogy’s wealth of material.
I would love to live in some place that was a combo of Bag End, Rivendell, Lothlórien, and Minas Tirith, but that was also a space ship. I guess it would be called Bagendellorienirith, Firefly-class.
Anyway, awesome stuff. I loved it! Let’s do it again!
Movies
Wobble through Les Miserables!
A small collection of clips from the upcoming musical film Les Miserables were uploaded to YouTube a couple days ago. For example, this one:
My thoughts:
Musically, sounds good. The singing sounds good, save for Amanda Seyfried as Cosette, who’s rapid vibrato makes it sound like she’s singing while driving over a bumpy road. I’m not sure the “live singing” adds anything spectacular, at least not in these brief clips, but it certainly doesn’t take anything away.
Camera-work wise, GAH!! I don’t mind the close-ups and the wide-angles, which I think will look awesome on the big screen, but why the wobbly handheld look? Is this a home-made movie? Is this a British TV show? Why can’t the English learn to hold a camera steady?
The worst example is in this clip, at about 35 seconds:
Oh, yes, let’s glance down at the letters and then back up at his face…? Very unprofessional looking. It makes me, as an audience member, feel like I’m not there, like elements of the scene are being concealed from me, like I’m being forced to watch something through the eyes of a tipsy drunken man. Ugh.
Movies
Thoughts on Rise of the Guardians
I saw the latest animated feature from DreamWorks recently, Rise of the Guardians, and I had the theater to myself, woohoo! Here are my thoughts. I think they’re spoiler free. I can’t promise, though.
The movie tells the tale of the mythical Jack Frost, who is summoned to become a “Guardian” to protect the children of the world from forces of fear and hopelessness, personified by the guy with the British accent, Pitch, aka the Boogie Man.
The Good
I loved the visual look and feel of the film. They really captured the mystery, wonder, storybook-ish magical-ness, and grandeur of the characters and their worlds. It was visually fantastic. DreamWorks can really nail it with their fantasy-oriented features.
I enjoyed the . . . what is it? Symbolism? The idea of the moon as God. If all the story ideas I have were published books, you’d see that I very much enjoy the idea of moons symbolizing powerful mysterious forces beyond human understanding. There’s something very natural about it, something very primal about being awed by a moon. It is a definite theme in my current novel-in-progress, Moonrise Ink.
I liked the idea of the main character, Jack Frost, having lost memories. I won’t give anything away, but that’s another story element I tend to enjoy, mysterious forgotten memories, at least when the characters still have personalities without them.
Finally, there was some good humor. Overall, it was kind of hit or miss, but I did laugh out loud quite a few times, more than I did in Wreck-It Ralph.
The Not So Good
One of my pet peeves is characters talking to themselves for the sake of exposition. It is such lazy writing. In this film, the villain especially loved to speak his intentions to no one.
There were so many moments in the film that could’ve been aided with some epic musical thematic scoring, but all we get are rinky-tink sprinkles of orchestration. Come on, gimme a melody! (Ah, sure… I know… it’s not that kind of show…) I prefer a John Powell How to Train Your Dragon sort of score.
Another thing that annoyed me was the whole idea of children needing to “believe.” The problem with belief being a force of good in and of itself is that it’s too vague. Belief in what? Belief in Santa Clause? Belief in wonder? It’s too vague for anything primal to be at stake. Fear is set up as the opposing force, but belief and fear are not opposites. You have to believe in something to fear it, after all. What is the opposite of fear? That should have been the force of good. (Of course, fear is also a rather vague force. Fear of what?)
There’s a little girl in the movie with disgusting messed up hair. Is that supposed to be cute? It’s not. It’s gross. Take a shower and brush your hair.
Overall, many scenes felt far too rushed. I really wanted to see some slower contemplative moments, with perhaps characters casually playing around with or using their powers or something. I wanted to get a feeling for what these characters and their worlds were like in their off-time. It’s easier to feel a world with the little things. Being constantly over the top seems to be an American habit. But when everything is over the top, nothing is.