{"id":772,"date":"2010-11-29T21:07:27","date_gmt":"2010-11-30T01:07:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/?p=772"},"modified":"2010-11-29T21:11:35","modified_gmt":"2010-11-30T01:11:35","slug":"no-more-princess-fairy-tales-for-disney","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/?p=772","title":{"rendered":"No more princess fairy tales for Disney?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I found <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/entertainment\/news\/la-et-1121-tangled-20101121,0,7895261.story?page=1\">this article<\/a> to be interesting.  It states:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Once upon a time, there was a studio in Burbank that spun classic fairy tales into silver-screen gold.<\/p>\n<p>But now the curtain is falling on &#8220;princess movies,&#8221; which have been a part of Disney Animation&#8217;s heritage since the 1937 debut of its first feature film, &#8220;Snow White.&#8221; The studio&#8217;s Wednesday release of &#8220;Tangled,&#8221; a contemporary retelling of the Rapunzel story, will be the last fairy tale produced by Disney&#8217;s animation group for the foreseeable future.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Actually, I think most of the &#8220;princess-ness&#8221; of Disney came about in the 90&#8217;s with <em>The Little Mermaid<\/em>, <em>Beauty and the Beast<\/em>, <em>Aladdin<\/em> and <em>Pocahontas<\/em>, all released in less than a decade, and all following a similar Broadway-influenced romantic comedy formula.  I&#8217;m sure Walt Disney himself never meant for his company to be defined by fairy tales or princesses.  They did <em>Snow White<\/em> in 1937, then didn&#8217;t do <em>Cinderella<\/em> until 1950, and didn&#8217;t do <em>Sleeping Beauty<\/em> until 1959.  That&#8217;s only three princess-oriented fairy tales done in old Uncle Walt&#8217;s lifetime.<\/p>\n<p>The article mentions that their <em>Princess and the Frog<\/em> didn&#8217;t do as well as they&#8217;d like.  I haven&#8217;t seen the movie yet, but looking at the previews, it certainly didn&#8217;t look that great.  It was tauted as introducing Disney&#8217;s first black princess just as the nation was getting its first black president.  A film decision like that should never be made for political brownie points.  And they were, dare I say, racist, playing to stereotypes and setting the film in New Orleans and making the music score jazzy.  The film shouldn&#8217;t have been set in America at all.  Unless the intent was to make the movie about racism (which I doubt, and there are already plenty of movies about that), the movie should&#8217;ve treated the princess just like any other princess.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, I digress.  My point is, I don&#8217;t think this news is really all that breath-taking.  It&#8217;s natural.  It&#8217;s obvious.<\/p>\n<p>I think it&#8217;s kind of silly to guess at what the public wants, because I don&#8217;t think you really can know, beyond certain genre generalizations.  Like &#8220;vampires are popular now&#8221; or &#8220;wizards are popular now&#8221; &#8230; but that doesn&#8217;t tell you what sort of story people would be interested in seeing, or what sort of stories they would <em>not<\/em> be interested in seeing.<\/p>\n<p>I think filmmakers should step away from looking at the profit numbers (as long as there&#8217;s a <em>profit<\/em> at least) and just do whatever interests <em>them<\/em> the most, whatever story gives them goosebumps just thinking about.  The audience does matter, but only to a certain degree&#8230; not to the degree of dictating what sort of film to make next.  Really, audiences have no idea what they want.<\/p>\n<p>Not that that&#8217;s not what Disney is doing.  I can&#8217;t really tell from the article what they&#8217;re doing; who knows how they&#8217;re making their decisions?<\/p>\n<p>Oh, and did they really want &#8220;Tangled&#8221; to appeal to boys?  Firstly, its style is all wrong for that, from the colors to the guy&#8217;s facial hair pattern.  Secondly, the preview doesn&#8217;t show enough thrilling action.  Instead it shows &#8220;Here comes the smolder&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The article also mentions that they&#8217;re no longer doing Hans Christian Andersen&#8217;s fairy tale <em>The Snow Queen<\/em>.  Though it&#8217;s been dramatized before, I&#8217;m rather happy about this.  Firstly, I&#8217;d hate to see the story Disney-ified.  The story has a darkness to it that Disney (or Pixar) would probably ruin, even if they ruin it well.  Secondly, I&#8217;d like to do it myself.  Not ruin it, that is, but turn it into an animated feature.  I guess there&#8217;s really not much of a chance of that, but if Disney had done it, there&#8217;d be <em>no<\/em> chance, so at least now there&#8217;s a one billionth of a percent chance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I found this article to be interesting. It states: Once upon a time, there was a studio in Burbank that spun classic fairy tales into silver-screen gold. But now the curtain is falling on &#8220;princess movies,&#8221; which have been a part of Disney Animation&#8217;s heritage since the 1937 debut of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[220,99],"tags":[290],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7gI4B-cs","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/772"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=772"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/772\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wizardwalk.com\/newblather\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}